- From: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fuku@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:15:48 +0900
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi, Kendall: >> 6. privacy section for protocol spec >> >> ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0416.html >> >> not much response... everybody agrees? > > I think it's pretty good and intend it to go into the protocol draft > ASAP. I've been concentrating on getting the WSDL right, then moving > to draft prose around it. I'd like to further put a room (place holder) in the protocol for the server to add (original) privacy/security related information in its reply. For the flexibility, I propose to add just a room where a server can put any (additional) information to the client. The detailed syntax and semantics of the data put there should be left to server's design. I thought I had sent a message saying this to the mailing list, but I can't find any... gee. Best, Yoshio fuku@w3.org fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 03:15:57 UTC