W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 29 Mar (confirmed)

From: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fuku@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:15:48 +0900
Message-ID: <001f01c5340d$9ac30b20$f1e41b85@steelball>
To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


>> 6. privacy section for protocol spec
>> ACTION EricP: propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0416.html
>> not much response... everybody agrees?
> I think it's pretty good and intend it to go into the protocol draft
> ASAP. I've been concentrating on getting the WSDL right, then moving
> to draft prose around it.

I'd like to further put a room (place holder) in the protocol for
the server to add (original)  privacy/security related information 
in its reply.

For the flexibility, I propose to add just a room where a server can 
put any (additional) information to the client. The detailed syntax
and semantics of the data put there should be left to server's design.

I thought I had sent a message saying this to the mailing list,
but I can't find any... gee.

Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 03:15:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:33 UTC