- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:03:35 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I haven't seen minutes for review... Kevin, did I miss them? Perhaps the IRC log will serve? http://www.w3.org/2005/03/15-dawg-irc Sometimes I use the minutes as a trigger to get started on my actions... in case you do too, here it is. I see the following open action items: ACTION: Bijan to to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL requirement ACTION: EricP to to review WSDL text proposal ACTION: AndyS to to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption ACTION: AndyS to to explain how to get a whole graph with CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH. ACTION: DaveB to to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment from Steer ACTION: EricP to to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points for test cases, to EricP or others) ACTION: KendallC to discuss warnings in the protocol spec. ACTION: KendallC to to add WSDL description of protocol to editor's draft, propose to WG ACTION: KendallC to to add "since we're using WSDL, you can use WS-Policy..." to protocol draft ACTION: EricP to to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test results page ACTION: SteveH to to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs. ACTION: DaveB to to to propose source test to approve ACTION: JosD to Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION op:dateTime triple ACTION: AndyS to to add the graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) ACTION: Jos to propose a test (based on dawg-triple-pattern-002?) with a . in a qname ACTION: AndyS to propose a SORT design ACTION: KendallC to add sort objective ACTION: DanC to add SORT issue ACTION: EricP to propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL protocol -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 17:03:37 UTC