- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:03:35 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I haven't seen minutes for review... Kevin, did I miss them?
Perhaps the IRC log will serve?
http://www.w3.org/2005/03/15-dawg-irc
Sometimes I use the minutes as a trigger to get started on my
actions... in case you do too, here it is.
I see the following open action items:
ACTION: Bijan to to propose text (story? etc.) to support WSDL
requirement
ACTION: EricP to to review WSDL text proposal
ACTION: AndyS to to clarify 5.4 w/r/t closed world assumption
ACTION: AndyS to to explain how to get a whole graph with
CONSTRUCT * and GRAPH.
ACTION: DaveB to to consider use of xsi:dataType ala comment
from Steer
ACTION: EricP to to propose to close valueTesting (bonus points
for test cases, to EricP or others)
ACTION: KendallC to discuss warnings in the protocol spec.
ACTION: KendallC to to add WSDL description of protocol to
editor's draft, propose to WG
ACTION: KendallC to to add "since we're using WSDL, you can use
WS-Policy..." to protocol draft
ACTION: EricP to to pair with SteveH on making the HTML test
results page
ACTION: SteveH to to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background"
and named graphs.
ACTION: DaveB to to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: JosD to Jos to propose an optional test based on ACTION
op:dateTime triple
ACTION: AndyS to to add the graph test cases (analagous to
valueTesting test cases)
ACTION: Jos to propose a test (based on
dawg-triple-pattern-002?) with a . in a qname
ACTION: AndyS to propose a SORT design
ACTION: KendallC to add sort objective
ACTION: DanC to add SORT issue
ACTION: EricP to propose "privacy considerations" for SPARQL
protocol
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 17:03:37 UTC