Re: comments on Protocol doc 14Jan2005

[Hi from KC airport; jumping in on just one point here...]

On Feb 26, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:46:20PM -0600, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> By the way, what exactly is an "RDF graph resource", again? That
>> sounds like it might be a useful idea, deserving of glossary entry.
> Hmm, perhaps I've gotten myself into trouble here, but I think I only
> meant that an "RDF graph resource" is a resource identified by a URI
> which has a representation with an RDF MIME type.

That seems pretty coherent, and, as Pat said, useful.

> Again, I think the easiest thing to do is to drop talk of "RDF graph
> resources".

I dunno... it seems like something worth keeping.

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 20:26:26 UTC