W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Constraints and options [was: Re: Minor Syntax issues]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:47:26 +0000
Message-ID: <42135CFE.1040907@hp.com>
To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 11:51:45 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>I tried several variations as below (zipped data, queries and manifest 
>>attached to save anyone retyping).
> Thanks Andy :) Good example, though the semnatics are a little wierd in
> the open world, but I suspect thats true of a lot of local OPTIONAL
> constrinats.
> Something that struck me is that you've given the Trutle files the .ttl
> extension, which seems reasonable, but all the others have .n3. Should I
> normalise all the extensions, or leave them as they are? If I should
> normalise, which way?
> - Steve

I have no great scheme here - I have swapped to using .ttl usually but I copied 
the manifest from a template elsewhere.

Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:50:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:33 UTC