Re: Feedback on Editor's Draft.

Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> Andy wrote:
> 
> 
>>The changes to the grammar should now be limited to anything coming
>>out of the sorting discussions.  I hope you will continue to provide
>>review and feedback - early working group feedback is very helpful.
> 
> 
> I will try the Editor's draft again, maybe next week.  The only way
> that I can truely vet it is to re-implement from the SPARQL grammar.
> Incremental change may have worked for you since you have a hand on
> the spec and another on the grammar, but it is not so easy to make
> bulk changes to an implementation without a clear diff (or even with 
> one :(

It wasn't very incremental :-(  From now on diff'ing should get you what you 
want.

	Andy

> Mind you, I have no objections to the syntax evolving as this is all
> still a working draft, it is just a little hard to track, and I think
> that the value comes from seeing whether what the spec says actually
> makes sense rather than seeing if I can get my implementation to accept
> the test cases (which are not yet a sufficient exercise of the grammar).
> 
> I also want to get a better grip, as I mentioned, on the semantics as
> written in the spec.
> 
> -bryan
> 
<snip/>

Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 20:26:47 UTC