- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:26:10 +0000
- To: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Cc: ''Eric Prud'hommeaux ' ' <eric@w3.org>, "''public-rdf-dawg@w3.org ' '" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: > Andy wrote: > > >>The changes to the grammar should now be limited to anything coming >>out of the sorting discussions. I hope you will continue to provide >>review and feedback - early working group feedback is very helpful. > > > I will try the Editor's draft again, maybe next week. The only way > that I can truely vet it is to re-implement from the SPARQL grammar. > Incremental change may have worked for you since you have a hand on > the spec and another on the grammar, but it is not so easy to make > bulk changes to an implementation without a clear diff (or even with > one :( It wasn't very incremental :-( From now on diff'ing should get you what you want. Andy > Mind you, I have no objections to the syntax evolving as this is all > still a working draft, it is just a little hard to track, and I think > that the value comes from seeing whether what the spec says actually > makes sense rather than seeing if I can get my implementation to accept > the test cases (which are not yet a sufficient exercise of the grammar). > > I also want to get a better grip, as I mentioned, on the semantics as > written in the spec. > > -bryan > <snip/>
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 20:26:47 UTC