- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 09:20:59 -0500
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 09:57:28AM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Approach 1: "CONSTRUCT *" is illegal if the query uses GRAPH. The > application writer has to be a bit more explicit and provide a template > that more accurately describes what they want. > > Approach 2: "CONSTRUCT" returns a dataset. Need to extend CONSTRUCT > templates to include GRAPH. > > Approach 3: Drop "CONSTRUCT *" all together. > > My preference is 3 > 1 > 2. If we do (3), I want to reintroduce the idea of getGraph in at least the abstract WSDL interface (or in a separate interface), since my willingness to drop getGraph was tied to the CONSTRUCT * alternative. I don't recall what our WSDL sketch said about getGraph, and I can't find the WSDL sketch in our archives... (And setting aside the getGraph dependency, I agree about dropping "CONSTRUCT *".) Kendall
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2005 14:24:30 UTC