- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:33:37 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2005-02-22T14:30Z tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/02/22-dawg-irc scribe: Howard Katz record for review: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0133.html ammendment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0143.html next meeting: ftf. see item 2. continue the following without discussion: ACTION: DanC to consider Asemantics hosting proposal w.r.t. WG schedule http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0072.html ACTION: SteveH to propose to host in Southampton right after XTech ACTION: PatH to propose to host in Florida ACTION: KendallC: to propose a solution to protocolRootReferent ACTION: SteveH to to propose tests for str() and =~ ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs ACTION: DanC: suggest formal definitions for SOURCE ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve comments on agenda progress on the above actions that I didn't see? 2. ftf5 Feb 28-1Mar in Cambridge, MA, USA http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html Input to the agenda? 1st scribe? KendallC? 3. SPARQL QL publication ACTION: EricP, make sure editor's draft as an inline issue (to be published) that we need to work this out DONE: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/ and there was much rejoicing hmm... trackback for WDs... 4. SPARQL result set ACTION: DaveB: discuss warnings in result set spec http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0144.html ACTION: DanC to ask Liam, via SemWeb CG, which XML groups might be interested in SPARQL result set WD Liam suggests the XSL WG. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-semweb-cg/2005Feb/0037.html 5. valueTesting, XSCH ACTION: EricP and PathH will review XSCH draft document http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ ACTION: JosD to review section 11 Testing Values <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests> progress: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0127.html ACTION JosD: Make 2 test cases over the same data using the op:dateTime predicate and without using it. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0146.html 6. accessingCollections ACTION: DanC to discuss accessingCollections in service description context http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0169.html postpone the issue? 7. Service Descriptions ACTION: DanC to Write up definitive service concept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0166.html ACTION: DanC to write up "sparqlParam" approach (reply to kendallC) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0167.html ACTION: KendallC to to think about predicate to relate html-forms and svc descriptions, and how this goes into the spec ACTION: KendallC to Add section for service descriptions and put graph specifying in it to start it off ACTION: KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec. ACTION: EricP: to inviestigate WSDL/SOAP encodings of SPARQL protocol CONTINUED but DanC has made some progress on this with Philippe Le Hégaret working with WSDL 2.0. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 14:34:09 UTC