- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:40:01 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 14:59 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote: > >>On Mar 21, 2005, at 2:21 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >> >>>On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:27 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote: > > [...] > >>>>I think it implicit in using WSDL. >>> >>>Our discussion was fairly explicit to the contrary: >>> >>> <xs:element name='queryString' type='xs:string'/> <!-- in, e.g., >>>SPARQL syntax --> >> >>I'm sorry, I didn't realize that had force instead of being merely a >>straw proposal for discussion. > > > It was just a straw proposal for discussion. > > But I understand the requirement to be about writing a WSDL description > for the protocol that's equivalent to these HTML forms... > > http://sparql.org/query.html Now with added "graph-id". I'm being conservative - only implementing what's high probability (IMHO) of being in the spec because it creates support costs for me otherwise. I don't see how rdf-dataset maps into HTTP usage. Andy > http://librdf.org/query?language=sparql > > and is given in the 1st example in > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ > > There's no XML serialization of the query needed for that. > > <snip/> Andy
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 22:40:36 UTC