W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Corrected sparqlx schema (sent the wrong one previously)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:28:57 -0600
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1111591737.8271.730.camel@localhost>

On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 09:55 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:46:05PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > I thought it might be something like that - you'd said your were doing 
> > examples so I followed the examples.
> Even worse, I simply included the wrong schema in my zip file. Doh!
> Here's the "correct" one -- that is, the one that actually schematizes
> the examples.

ah... good... in compact syntax... something I can grok at a glance.
(if there are good schema visualization tools, I don't have any
experience with them).

When I saw Andy's abstract syntax message, I thought "I wonder
what that looks like in RNG syntax".

Now I can compare and contrast...

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 15:28:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:33 UTC