- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:28:57 -0600
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 09:55 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:46:05PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > I thought it might be something like that - you'd said your were doing > > examples so I followed the examples. > > Even worse, I simply included the wrong schema in my zip file. Doh! > > Here's the "correct" one -- that is, the one that actually schematizes > the examples. ah... good... in compact syntax... something I can grok at a glance. (if there are good schema visualization tools, I don't have any experience with them). When I saw Andy's abstract syntax message, I thought "I wonder what that looks like in RNG syntax". Now I can compare and contrast... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 15:28:58 UTC