- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:54:24 -0600
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: DAWG Mailing List <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 15:10 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > Les chiens, > > I've updated > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol.wsdl > > <!-- $Id: sparql-protocol.wsdl,v 1.4 2005/03/21 20:00:34 kclark Exp $ > > I consider this to be nearly complete w/r/t the "abstract" portion of > the protocol; that is, the interfaces, their types, operations, and > faults. Cool... I'm interested in WSDL tools that do cool stuff with it... are there WSDL validators and such? Have you tried it out in any tools? > The changes include importing the results format, declaring > schema types for "the rdf dataset", for some operation response types > (graph creation & deletion), hmm... graph creation and deletion? we decided which interfaces and operations in Boston... RESOLVED: that the SPARQL WSDL description shall have 3 interfaces (SPARQLQuery and SPARQLDiscovery and SPARQLQueryAndDiscovery), each with one operation -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item_03 The decision is a little funky, because it depends on a decision that I thought we had made earlier but didn't. Still... I suspect you're more likely to get consensus by sticking to just those three. > and for "query", which is a string plus > an rdf dataset (though, now that I look at it again, I realize that > the rdf-dataset bit isn't quite right)> > > It is less complete w/r/t HTTP and SOAP bindings. > > Kendall Clark -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 22:54:26 UTC