- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:50:35 -0500
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Mar 3, 2005, at 4:51 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > On Tuesday, the DAWG f2f took up syntax issues. I should add/clarify... we made a decision on punctuation syntax in Helsinki... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item18 but that Helsinki decision wasn't by consensus, and each outstanding objection is a risk that our request for CR will be turned down. So I consulted some of the WG members during a break about whether they would like to spend some meeting time discussing this with TimBL. Based on that advice, I invited TimBL to join the discussion. I made it clear that we weren't quorate to decide anything, since this wasn't on the agenda in time. As we reviewed the Helsinki records, I heard several people say "oh, I didn't understand the proposal that way" which sounds like new information. So I'm re-opening the decision. And for tracking purposes, I'm putting it on the issues list: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax There seemed to be quit a bit of support for this syntax proposal here in Boston, so I'm hoping everybody can consider it before the 8 March telcon. I won't be there; Kendall has agreed to chair. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 22:50:32 UTC