- From: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fuku@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:58:27 +0900
- To: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi, I remember we discussed about the semantics accompanied with our reification syntax? (Am I wrong? Please excuse me) If my understanding is correct, the semantics of "reification" differs from RDF/XML and N3 (in the latter it might have to be called "quoting?") My question is which semantics do we accompany to our syntax (what was the resolution) ? Literal reading of the document leads to the answer of saying: "we mean the former, for it's syntax sugar for RDF reification." But our syntax is so close to N3 (by now), I wonder if we step forward (out?) to quoting. In case we should not do so, I think commenting it(=the difference) in the doc is worth doing. How do you think? Yoshio fuku@w3.org fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2005 18:58:29 UTC