public-html@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Sam Ruby
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
[Bug 6637] New: Put boolean and enumerated attributes next to each other bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby

Friday, 27 February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Robert J Burns
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Assessing interest in meeting during the November W3C Tech Plenary/AC Meetings Week (poll coming) Chris Wilson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Robert J Burns
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
Require quotes around attributes for more characters Simon Pieters
[Bug 6630] New: Optionalness of start tags when element is empty bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Shane McCarron
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Smylers
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Draft text for summary attribute definition Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Julian Reschke
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Smylers
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Smylers
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Smylers
@rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Joshue O Connor
Re: summary="" and Universal Design in HTML5 Joshue O Connor
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Julian Reschke
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Joshue O Connor
H:TML Status section updated [was: Moving forward on deciding] Michael(tm) Smith
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Simon Pieters
[Bug 6628] New: WebSocket.URL and EventSource.URL should return the absolute URL bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Robert J Burns
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Robert J Burns
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Robert J Burns
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Robert J Burns
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
RE: disinterested chairing [was Re: summary="" in HTML5] John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: disinterested chairing [was Re: summary="" in HTML5] Robert J Burns

Thursday, 26 February 2009

Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Matt Morgan-May
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Philip TAYLOR
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Matt Morgan-May
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Philip TAYLOR
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Matt Morgan-May
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Julian Reschke
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Matt Morgan-May
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Dan Connolly
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Philip TAYLOR
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Philip TAYLOR
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
minutes: HTML WG Weekly 26 Feb 2009 Dan Connolly
Re: disinterested chairing [was Re: summary="" in HTML5] Sam Ruby
disinterested chairing [was Re: summary="" in HTML5] Robert J Burns
Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-02-26 Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-02-26 Michael(tm) Smith
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Dan Connolly
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Philip Taylor
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 James Graham
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Simon Pieters
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Joshue O Connor
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Simon Pieters
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Simon Pieters
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Ian Hickson
Re: Dimension attributes and video Ian Hickson
Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Dimension attributes and video Boris Zbarsky
Re: Dimension attributes and video Ian Hickson
Re: Dimension attributes and video Rob Sayre
Re: Dimension attributes and video Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

Re: Dimension attributes and video Ian Hickson
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: "Where's the Beef?" department (was RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns) Matt Morgan-May
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Joshue O Connor
Re: "Where's the Beef?" department (was RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Gez Lemon
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Matt Morgan-May
RE: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Sailesh Panchang
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Jonas Sicking
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Jonas Sicking
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Jonas Sicking
Re: HTML 5 Spec, broken link (anchor) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Sam Ruby
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Jonas Sicking
HTML 5 Spec, broken link (anchor) Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Dimension attributes and video Boris Zbarsky
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Jonas Sicking
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Janina Sajka
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Janina Sajka
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 William Loughborough
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Sam Ruby
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 David Poehlman
Re: Foster-parenting and taint Henri Sivonen
Re: Foster-parenting and taint Henri Sivonen
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Sam Ruby
Foster-parenting and taint Henri Sivonen
Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Robert J Burns
Re: another example canvas use- cufon - another accessibility concern and spec contradiction Ian Hickson
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Sam Ruby
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Sam Ruby
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Laura Carlson
Re: "Where's the Beef?" department (was RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns) Rob Sayre
RE: "Where's the Beef?" department (was RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns) John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: summary="" in HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Sam Ruby
{agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-02-26 Chris Wilson
Re: "Where's the Beef?" department (was RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns) Jonas Sicking
"Where's the Beef?" department (was RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns) John Foliot - WATS.ca

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

Re: summary="" in HTML5 James Graham
Re: summary="" in HTML5 (2 of 2) David Poehlman
RE: summary="" in HTML5 Sailesh Panchang
another example canvas use- cufon - another accessibility concern and spec contradiction Steven Faulkner
RE: summary="" in HTML5 (2 of 2) Sailesh Panchang
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Laurens Holst
[Bug 6618] New: </body> and </html> early on handled in a Gecko/WebKit/Presto-inconsisten way bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: summary="" in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
Re: R2866 : better talk about "CSS display" instead of "CSS tables" Olivier GENDRIN
Re: summary="" in HTML5 Joshue O Connor
Re: summary="" in HTML5 Steven Faulkner
Re: summary="" in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
Re: R2866 : better talk about "CSS display" instead of "CSS tables" Anne van Kesteren
R2866 : better talk about "CSS display" instead of "CSS tables" Olivier GENDRIN
Re: frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode Henri Sivonen
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre
Re: summary="" in HTML5 Leif Halvard Silli
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: summary="" in HTML5 William Loughborough
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Leif Halvard Silli
summary="" in HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Jonas Sicking

Monday, 23 February 2009

Re: Use and abuse of @summary Michael Cooper
Re: frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode Ian Hickson
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-54 doctype-legacy-compat, was: Input on the agenda Dan Connolly
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Poehlman
Re: Input on the agenda Dan Connolly
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Singer
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
RE: FW: [Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5] Chris Wilson
Re: [Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5] Arthur Barstow
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Patrick H. Lauke
frameset-ok as flag vs. insertion mode Henri Sivonen
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Henri Sivonen
Re: FW: [Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5] Sam Ruby
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Henri Sivonen
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Steven Faulkner
[Bug 6614] New: Restricting multiple character encoding declarations per document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
ISSUE-54, was: Input on the agenda Julian Reschke
Re: Use and abuse of @summary James Graham
Re: Use and abuse of @summary James Graham
Input on the agenda Ian Hickson
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Simon Pieters
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Steven Faulkner
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Steven Faulkner
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Lachlan Hunt
[Bug 6613] New: Allow <meta charset="UTF-8"/> in XHTML bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
FW: [Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5] Michael(tm) Smith
Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Ian Hickson
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre
On subsetting the spec [was: Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5] Jim Jewett

Sunday, 22 February 2009

Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5 Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Doug Schepers
[Bug 6610] New: add a preventable forced-fragment method bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6609] New: negative keywords-not meta tags bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6608] New: please undeprecate <center> for older browsers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6607] New: wrapping text to limit line length without a table bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6606] New: generic 3rd-party <mark>, Smart Tags, and Activities prevention bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Ian Hickson
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Doug Schepers

Saturday, 21 February 2009

RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
fieldset: a CSS block formatting context? Daniel Schattenkirchner
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns William Loughborough
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Joshue O Connor
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Media element events Ian Hickson
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Leif Halvard Silli
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Ian Hickson
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Singer
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Karl Dubost
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Ian Hickson
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre

Friday, 20 February 2009

Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Karl Dubost
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Steve Axthelm
Re: Caption and summary survey Leif Halvard Silli
Entropy w.r.t. Namespace Discussion Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Robert J Burns
Re: video: various width/height attributes Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Ian Hickson
Re: Caption and summary survey Steven Faulkner
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Joshue O Connor
Re: Caption and summary survey Joshue O Connor
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Leif Halvard Silli
Caption and summary survey Leif Halvard Silli
Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Robert J Burns
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Ian Hickson
Re: several messages Robert J Burns

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Singer
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Rob Sayre
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Reuse of 1999 XHTML namespace, text/html and application/xhtml+xml media types Sam Ruby
Re: DOM idiosyncracies and made-up tag names Philip Taylor
Re: DOM idiosyncracies and made-up tag names Anne van Kesteren
DOM idiosyncracies and made-up tag names Dailey, David P.
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Steven Faulkner
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Rob Sayre
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Boris Zbarsky
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Leif Halvard Silli
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Ian Hickson
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns William Loughborough
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns William Loughborough
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Bolter
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Maciej Stachowiak
Re: several messages Ian Hickson
Review of xhtml-media-types Larry Masinter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Philip TAYLOR
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Reuse of 1999 XHTML namespace, text/html and application/xhtml+xml media types Dan Connolly
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Sam Ruby
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
RE: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns John Foliot - WATS.ca
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Dan Connolly
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Jon Gunderson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Robert J Burns
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Sam Ruby
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Smylers
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Jon Gunderson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Robert J Burns
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Bolter
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Boris Zbarsky
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Bolter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Robert J Burns
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Simon Pieters
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns David Bolter
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Boris Zbarsky
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Jon Gunderson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types ISSUE-60 Robert J Burns
(no subject) Robert J Burns
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Smylers
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robert J Burns
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Robert J Burns
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Boris Zbarsky
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Robert J Burns
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Joshue O Connor
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robert J Burns
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Boris Zbarsky
Re: Joint task force on ARIA user agent implementation Dan Connolly
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Boris Zbarsky
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Julian Reschke
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Julian Reschke
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Philip Taylor
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Janina Sajka
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Boris Zbarsky
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Robin Berjon
{agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-02-19 Sam Ruby
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Boris Zbarsky
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Alexander Surkov
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Robin Berjon
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Alexander Surkov
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns William Loughborough
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Dan Connolly
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Philip Taylor
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns James Graham
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Steven Faulkner
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Dan Connolly
Re: Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Alexander Surkov
Re: Use and abuse of @summary Simon Pieters
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robin Berjon
Example canvas element use - accessibility concerns Steven Faulkner
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Joshue O Connor
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Joshue O Connor
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Joshue O Connor
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? James Graham
Use and abuse of @summary Steven Faulkner
Re: Caption@title instead of table@summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Michael A. Puls II
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Ian Hickson
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Michael A. Puls II
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Ian Hickson
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Michael A. Puls II
Caption@title instead of table@summary? Leif Halvard Silli
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Ian Hickson
Re: table/@summary, Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Leif Halvard Silli
Re: google supports rel="canonical" (ISSUE-27 rel-ownership) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Roy T. Fielding
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Boris Zbarsky
Re: fragid navigation and pct-encoded Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Sam Ruby
Re: google supports rel="canonical" (ISSUE-27 rel-ownership) Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Dean Edridge

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Rob Sayre
Re: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Ian Hickson
google supports rel="canonical" (ISSUE-27 rel-ownership) Dan Connolly
Re: table/@summary, Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robert J Burns
table/@summary, Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Rob Sayre
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Maciej Stachowiak
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Maciej Stachowiak
WG Decision - spec license use cases Sam Ruby
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robert J Burns
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Larry Masinter
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robert J Burns
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robin Berjon
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Philip TAYLOR
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robin Berjon
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Dan Connolly
Re: table caption as a short description, @summary as a long description James Graham
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
[Bug 6590] New: character encoding mapping needs to be used for form submission too bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Robert J Burns
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types Ian Hickson
Re: table caption as a short description, @summary as a long description Leif Halvard Silli
Re: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types (was Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong") Maciej Stachowiak
RE: ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types (was Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong") Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Karl Dubost
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Karl Dubost
ISSUE-4: Versioning, namespace URIs and MIME types (was Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong") Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 16 February 2009

RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Lachlan Hunt
What's the problem with Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace? Robert J Burns
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Sam Ruby
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Maciej Stachowiak
What's the problem with Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace? Robert J Burns
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Sam Ruby
announce list [was: Re: publication decision [was: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status]] Jim Jewett
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Maciej Stachowiak
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: XHTML namespace, DOCTYPE, and other versioning mechanisms Maciej Stachowiak
Re: XHTML namespace, DOCTYPE, and other versioning mechanisms Julian Reschke
XHTML namespace, DOCTYPE, and other versioning mechanisms Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Boris Zbarsky
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Anne van Kesteren
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Edward O'Connor
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Maciej Stachowiak
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Maciej Stachowiak
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
[Bug 6586] New: Zero margin quirk not quite right bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6585] New: Rendering: <marquee bgcolor> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: priority based loading of web page elements Alexey Feldgendler
Re: priority based loading of web page elements Olivier GENDRIN
Re: priority based loading of web page elements Jens Meiert

Sunday, 15 February 2009

priority based loading of web page elements raghu bharat
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Robert J Burns
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5 Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5 Michael(tm) Smith
Minor parsing wording comments Cameron McCormack
Re: The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Bill Lipa
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Andrew Fedoniouk

Saturday, 14 February 2009

Re: The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Ian Hickson
Re: The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Ian Hickson

Friday, 13 February 2009

Re: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Adam Barth

Saturday, 14 February 2009

RE: Spec license use cases - WG Decision on the Record? Dailey, David P.
Re: publication decision [was: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status] Smylers
Re: Spec license use cases - WG Decision on the Record? Jonas Sicking
Re: Spec license use cases - WG Decision on the Record? Sam Ruby

Friday, 13 February 2009

Re: The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Ian Hickson
RE: Implementation of head@profile Larry Masinter
Re: The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas Ian Hickson
Re: designMode and scripts (designModeScriptBlocked) Ian Hickson
Re: publication decision [was: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: publication decision [was: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status] Dan Connolly
Re: publication decision [was: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: publication decision [was: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status] Dan Connolly
table caption as a short description, @summary as a long description Steven Faulkner
Re: revised table headers design is OK, right? Dan Connolly
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Sam Ruby
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Sam Ruby
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Sam Ruby
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status William Loughborough
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Philip TAYLOR
Re: Implementation of head@profile James Graham
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Sam Ruby
Re: revised table headers design is OK, right? James Graham
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Philip TAYLOR
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Simon Pieters
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Philip TAYLOR
Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Simon Pieters
Re: Table feedback Ian Hickson
Re: Character Set Alias Matching Ian Hickson
Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Karl Dubost
Re: window.onerror initial value Ian Hickson
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Ian Hickson
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Rob Sayre
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 12 February 2009

Re: TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5 Geoffrey Sneddon
TR/web-forms-2 -> TR/html5 Anne van Kesteren
The status and compatibility of web standards Justin Anthony Knapp
details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Philip TAYLOR
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Sam Ruby
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Philip TAYLOR
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Sam Ruby
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Dean Edridge
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Philip TAYLOR
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robert J Burns
Re: revised table headers design is OK, right? James Graham
Re: a11y : cell headers order has to be consistent and ordered (was: revised table headers design is OK, right?) Olivier GENDRIN
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robin Berjon
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robin Berjon
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Julian Reschke
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Julian Reschke
Re: revised table headers design is OK, right? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robin Berjon
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robert J Burns
Re: revised table headers design is OK, right? James Graham
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Steven Faulkner
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Julian Reschke
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robin Berjon
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: alt / no alt / etc Re: "downplayed errors" Charles McCathieNevile
[Bug 6563] New: Specify if innerHTML setting should use the quirkiness of the document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6562] New: Define parsing quirks bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Robert J Burns
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: several messages Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ian Hickson
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ian Hickson
Change to AAA Ian Hickson
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Jonas Sicking
Re: alt / no alt / etc Re: "downplayed errors" Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Lachlan Hunt
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Dan Connolly
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Dan Connolly
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Jonas Sicking
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Sam Ruby
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robert J Burns
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Jonas Sicking
Action-83: 16x16 IE icon Chris Wilson
RE: Spec license Dan Connolly
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Robert J Burns
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: revised table headers design is OK, right? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Julian Reschke
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Jonas Sicking
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Lachlan Hunt
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" L. David Baron
revised table headers design is OK, right? Dan Connolly
RE: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Edward O'Connor
What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong" Larry Masinter
Re: alt / no alt / etc Re: "downplayed errors" Leif Halvard Silli
designMode and scripts (designModeScriptBlocked) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Joint task force on ARIA user agent implementation Anne van Kesteren
Re: Fwd: table, tbody, tr (was : Rendering section feedback) Ian Hickson
Re: Rendering section feedback Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Rendering section feedback Ian Hickson
Fwd: table, tbody, tr (was : Rendering section feedback) Olivier GENDRIN
Re: IE compat with coords parsing Ian Hickson
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Ian Hickson
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Rendering section feedback Ian Hickson
Re: Rendering section feedback Anne van Kesteren
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Simon Pieters
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Andrew Fedoniouk
alt / no alt / etc Re: "downplayed errors" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Rendering section feedback Ian Hickson
Re: [html5] proposal to add <text> element. Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa
[Bug 6556] New: When parsing legacy color returns an error bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Rendering section feedback Simon Pieters
Re: [Bug 6543] New: Mint a new element for figure captions Leif Halvard Silli
Rendering section feedback Ian Hickson
Re: "downplayed errors" Leif Halvard Silli
[html5] proposal to add <text> element. Andrew Fedoniouk

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Re: "downplayed errors" Robert J Burns
Re: "downplayed errors" Leif Halvard Silli
Re: "downplayed errors" Jon Barnett
Re: "downplayed errors" Robert J Burns
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Ian Hickson
Re: "downplayed errors" Henri Sivonen
Re: "downplayed errors" Ian Hickson
Re: "downplayed errors" Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 9 February 2009

Joint task force on ARIA user agent implementation Michael Cooper
[Bug 6546] New: List event handler attributes for certain elements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6544] New: Allow width=0 on <img> and <iframe> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: [Bug 6543] New: Mint a new element for figure captions Robert J Burns
[Bug 6543] New: Mint a new element for figure captions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Sunday, 8 February 2009

Re: [Bug 6536] New: Time element examples should be in the context of a goal-oriented microformat use case Ben Boyle

Saturday, 7 February 2009

URL Parsing: Add note of what unreserved becomes Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson

Friday, 6 February 2009

Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Rendering: default style for <figure> Olivier GENDRIN
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Rendering: default style for <figure> Boris Zbarsky
Rendering: default style for <figure> Simon Pieters
[Bug 6536] New: Time element examples should be in the context of a goal-oriented microformat use case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Henri Sivonen
Re: "downplayed errors" Philip TAYLOR
Re: "downplayed errors" Henri Sivonen
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Jonas Sicking
Re: Design principles - building from justification Maciej Stachowiak
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Maciej Stachowiak
ISSUE-66 image analysis heuristics Robert J Burns
Re: Design principles - building from justification Sam Ruby
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Design principles - building from justification Leif Halvard Silli
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Andrew Fedoniouk

Thursday, 5 February 2009

Re: Design principles - building from justification Ian Hickson
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Rob Sayre
RE: Design principles - building from justification Justin James
Re: Design principles - building from justification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Design principles - building from justification Ian Hickson
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Design principles - building from justification Philip TAYLOR
RE: simple shorthand syntax proposal Dailey, David P.
Design principles - building from justification Ian Hickson
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Robert J Burns
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Alexey Feldgendler
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Murray Maloney
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Murray Maloney
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Lachlan Hunt
Rendering Margins and Padding Lachlan Hunt
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Håkon Wium Lie
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Karl Dubost
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Lachlan Hunt
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Håkon Wium Lie
Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal Smylers
RE: simple shorthand syntax proposal Håkon Wium Lie
RE: simple shorthand syntax proposal Dailey, David P.
simple shorthand syntax proposal Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Ian Jacobs
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Rendering: more typos Anne van Kesteren
Rendering: typos Anne van Kesteren
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Sam Ruby
Re: "downplayed errors" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Rob Sayre
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Henri Sivonen
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Julian Reschke
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Rob Sayre
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Henri Sivonen
"downplayed errors" Ian Hickson
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Rob Sayre
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Henri Sivonen
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Robert J Burns
Re: Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Robert J Burns
Re: Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Karl Dubost
Re: Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Cameron McCormack
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Karl Dubost
Re: Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Karl Dubost
RE: head@profile: another dropped attribute Larry Masinter
Re: head@profile: another dropped attribute Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Implementation of head@profile Ian Hickson
RE: Implementation of head@profile Larry Masinter
Implementation of head@profile Larry Masinter
Style sheet for W3C version of the spec Cameron McCormack
head@profile: another dropped attribute Larry Masinter

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

Re: Rendering: align=right and 'margin-right:auto' Simon Pieters
Re: table-summary argument Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Rendering: align=right and 'margin-right:auto' L. David Baron
Rendering: comments Anne van Kesteren
Re: Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Murray Maloney
Rendering: align=right and 'margin-right:auto' Simon Pieters
Re: Spec license Karl Dubost
[Bug 6529] New: value DOM attribute for input element in File Upload state bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Lachlan Hunt
Re: Spec license Ian Hickson
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Lachlan Hunt
Re: Spec license Henri Sivonen
Re: Spec license Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: table-summary argument Matt Morgan-May
Re: table-summary argument Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

Re: table-summary argument Robert J Burns
RE: table-summary argument Larry Masinter
Re: table-summary argument Matt Morgan-May
Re: Spec license Robert J Burns
RE: Spec license Dailey, David P.
Re: Spec license Sam Ruby
Re: Spec license L. David Baron
Re: Spec license Cameron McCormack
Re: table-summary argument Sam Ruby
Re: Spec license Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Spec license Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Spec license Rob Sayre
Re: Spec license L. David Baron
Re: Spec license Robert J Burns
Re: Spec license Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Charter (was: Re: Discussions with plh) Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: table-summary argument Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: table-summary argument Philip Taylor
[html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Murray Maloney
Re: Spec license Philip Taylor
table-summary argument Larry Masinter
Re: Spec license Sam Ruby
Re: Spec license Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Rendering feedback Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Rendering feedback Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Spec license Boris Zbarsky
Re: Spec license Karl Dubost
Re: Spec license James Graham
Re: Spec license Sam Ruby
Re: Spec license (was: Re: Discussions with plh) Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: Spec license (was: Re: Discussions with plh) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Sam Ruby
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Spec license Henri Sivonen
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Spec license Sam Ruby
Spec license (was: Re: Discussions with plh) Henri Sivonen
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Henri Sivonen
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Lachlan Hunt
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Karl Dubost

Monday, 2 February 2009

Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Sam Ruby
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" Ian Hickson
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Maciej Stachowiak
Need differentiator between "no alt text provided" and "no alt text necessary" James Craig
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Sam Ruby
Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Discussions with plh (License) Sam Ruby
Re: Discussions with plh (License) Dan Connolly
Re: Rendering feedback Simon Pieters
Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward] Sam Ruby
Re: Rendering feedback L. David Baron
Rendering feedback Simon Pieters
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Murray Maloney
scribe volunteers? Dan Connolly
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Simon Pieters
Re: Table feedback Ben Millard
[Bug 6516] New: obsolete attributes on HTMLDocument assume there is a body element bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6515] New: the body element event handler attributes and missing Window object bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Philip TAYLOR
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 1 February 2009

Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Lachlan Hunt
Re: [html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Sam Ruby
[html-author] Updates to the HTML Reference Lachlan Hunt
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby
Character Set Alias Matching Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Ian Hickson
Floating point number feedback Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Leif Halvard Silli

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:34:03 UTC