- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:38:23 -0600
- To: public-html@w3.org
Thanks for taking notes last week, Lachlan. Mike and I might have given the impression that it's our job to finish up and send out the teleconference minutes every week, but that's not necessarily the case; I'm sure anyone in the WG can learn to produce acceptable minutes. The traditional tools and techniques are documented in scribe 101 http://www.w3.org/2008/04/scribe.html I just linked that from http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#telcon It concludes with "Once the record has been approved by the Group, send a text version of the record to the Group list." but I don't think our group is interested in any formal minutes approval ritual; Sam an I are happy for scribes to send directly to public-html-wg-announce@w3.org . <DanC> in some groups, the chair checks the minutes every week. I doubt we want to do that. <DanC> So my preference is that the scribe is the only person in the critical path for getting the minutes out <rubys1> no objections here So I added a checkbox to the survey: HTML WG tasks http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tasks83/ (I also extended the duration for another year) If you're willing to serve as scribe once in a while, please check the "serve as scribe for teleconferences" box. If we have half a dozen or a dozen people willing to do this, that should work fine. Otherwise, I'll probably change the group norms to just let raw IRC logs serve as minutes or something. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 20:38:32 UTC