- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, James Craig wrote: > On Feb 2, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > The very next sentence is: > > > > If the image is available, the element represents the image specified > > by the src attribute. > > > > ...and the Rendering section (which I'm writing as we speak) will say > > something along the lines of "user agents are expected to render <img> > > elements as replaced elements showing the image they represent" or some > > such like. > > Both of those are fine, but neither adequately defines how a user agent > should "render" the non-visual equivalent of the image. I think Maciej's > wording proposal above does. The non-image case is handled by the sentence after the one I quote above, and will also have detailed text in the rendering section. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 01:41:03 UTC