- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:31:09 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, janina@rednote.net
Dan Connolly wrote: > Is this somehow insufficiently explicit? > > "Minutes ... should be sent to public-html-wg-announce within a day or > two." > -- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#telcon I re-read the page after sending my message, and did indeed see the text to which you refer. However, it is mentioned solely in the context of telephone meetings and teleconferences, so unless one is in the habit of participating in either of these, one is unlikely to think to subscribe to the list. But surely more importantly, an announcement such as this should, at the very least, have been copied to the "public-html" list. The use of multiple lists reminds one more of "divide and conquer" than it does of democracy and open debate. > The subscription list for public-html-wg-announce > the same as for public-html, and both of them > include P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk . Well, I have used SeaMonkey's "Subject or sender contains" filter to search for all mail from "-announce" and find four messages, none of which originate from public-html-wg-announce. But thank you for taking the trouble to check the list membership; I appreciate that. I would be interested to learn to where the messages are, in fact, going ... Philip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 18:31:55 UTC