- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:18:42 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Larry Masinter wrote: > > I'm discussing whether there is to be a standard way of indicating which > mode is intended or desired. I agree that in some circumstances, > allowing someone to say something about the mode intended can have > unintended side effects which also have to be mitigated, but the > possibility of those side effects isn't sufficient justification for > avoiding having a standard method. Doesn't HTML5 already define the standard methods for user agents to determine which mode to use? I'm confused. > > Then my original e-mail on this thread is relevant in that it shows > > that we only have two possible axes for versioning, namely the > > namespace and the tag name for whatever elements we want to version. > > Well, no, those aren't the only two *possible* axes, those are the two > that you may prefer. DOCTYPE, version attributes and other mechanisms > are also *possible* axes, and no version mechanism by itself may be > sufficient. The DOCTYPE axis and version attributes can't be used for triggering modes, since they're not available in the example I gave in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0375.html (Unless you are talking about modes that are intended to be non-conforming and not used, in which case they don't need to be available. This is the case with the quirks and limited-quirks modes we have currently.) > > Versioning in general is bad idea IMHO, as discussed almost two years ago: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Jun/0024.html > > Version designations inside web document formats when there are multiple > versions is a fundamental distributed network design, certainly over 30 > years old. The earliest discussion I can readily find related to the web > is only 16 years old, though. See: > > http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/archives/WWW-TALK/www-talk-1992.messages/216.html > > The principles of versioning discussed then have been underlying all > MIME registrations and format discussions in the intervening years. I wouldn't consider MIME registrations a success story. I certainly wouldn't consider them evidence that versioning is a good thing. They are at best inconclusive on the matter, IMHO. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 02:19:17 UTC