Re: Discussions with plh [was: Moving Forward]

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote:
> One query, Sam :
> 
> Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
>> We started with the license.  In my discussions with Ian and at 
>> Mozilla, I gathered that it was a shared understanding that by October 
>> that the license for the W3C license would be <various things>
> 
> I think I understand what a licence is; I am far
> less certain what a "licence for a licence" is,
> as in "the license for the W3C license".

Bah.

How about "the W3C license for the HTML 5 Document"?  By that I mean to 
include any and all of [Working Draft|Candidate Recommendation|Proposed 
Recommendation|Recommendation|Working Group Note].

- Sam Ruby

Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 22:20:41 UTC