- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:50:17 +0100
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, plh@w3.org
Jonas Sicking wrote: > ... > Agreed on both accounts. > > However there is definitely an issue to solve, and that is how to > solve the fact that both the HTML WG and the XHTML2 WG are defining > next versions of XHTML1.1. And doing so in incompatible ways (i.e. > neither spec is a strict superset of the other). > ... There's the additional issue of the XMTML2 WG and Semantic Web Deployment WG redefining the meaning of @rel in XHTML 1 (when used with RDFa) -- so it's not exclusively an XHTML2 vocabulary issue. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 19:51:18 UTC