- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:51:46 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Michael A. Puls II wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:30:25 -0500, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > > Given: > > <a href="#a a">...</a> > > FWIW, here's how I expect it to work (whether it does or not) and makes > the most sense to me: > > <a href="#a a">...</a> gets normalized to <a href="#a%20a">...</a> > (author should have used "#a%20a" in the first place and not have left > the space unencoded). This makes the fragid uri component "a%20a". Then, > to get a string from that, "a%20a" needs to be percent-decoded to "a a". > Then, it should match name="a a" or id="a a". > > If you want to match name="a%20a" or id="a%20a", you'd need <a > href="#a%2520a">...</a>. > > I think of it the same way as if a fragid hvalue in a query string were > to match @name and @id. For example, href="?fragid=a a" would be > normalized to href="fragid=a%20a". Then, if you wanted to get the fragid > value that the percent-encoded fragid hvalue represents, you'd have to > percent-decode "a%20a" to "a a" first and then look for a match. I agree with you in principle, but in practice we are required by legacy content to have a mechanism which will have this: <a href="#%3F">...</a> ...match: <a name="%3F"></a> The question is how to achieve this while staying as close as possible to existing specifications and sanity. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 06:52:24 UTC