- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:24:53 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Manu Sporny wrote: > ... > Please be aware of these initiatives before responding in order to > contribute to a more productive discussion. > ... Manu, I'm aware of these discussions. It would be incorrect to assume that this is about a discussion whether to use CURIEs, or not to, in *general*. The concern that triggered this new discussion is about the @rel attribute, which is not new, and which is not solely controlled by the XHTML2 working group. Thus, it would have been safer not to use CURIEs here at all, or at least to use safe CURIEs. The introduction of CURIE values for the *new* attributes is a separate problem. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 15:25:42 UTC