- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:32:26 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > For example, I think we could get consensus that img with no al > attribute is "conformant but not recommended". I don't think we will get > consensus that img with no alt is conformant and recommended, and I am > dubious about consensus that it is non-conformant. As far as I can tell we already have consensus on alt="" being required. (With one or two exceptions, the spec requires alt="" to be present. The exceptions are machine-checkable.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 02:33:03 UTC