- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:39:54 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Larry Masinter wrote: > I spoke too soon. In fact Dreamweaver supports the insertion of the 'profile' attribute and its value when the user uses dialogs to insert/edit the head tag and when code hinting. See > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0032.html > for screen shots. Looking at those screenshots, it is hard to imagine that the level of support in Dreamweaver goes beyond a table somewhere in the source code that lists it as an attribute that can appear on <head> and that takes a URI. Indeed the UI is misleading because it brings up a filepicker that has clearly been optimised for inserting images and hyperlinks. If this is the extent of the support, I suggest that the example of Dreamweaver is not very convincing as "authoring tool support for @profile". Indeed it's an example of how hard it is to provide intuitive, helpful UI around the feature (because, for example, if a user types class="hCard" they probably, per spec, should have the relevant profile URI. But it is as easy for a client to detect something that looks like a microformat and process it without the profile as it is for the authoring tool to detect it and insert the profile. And if you fix it on the client you have the advantage of fixing it for all the cases where the author wasn't using an intelligent authoring tool. So you end up with the status quo which is that when @profile is present it is ignored).
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 14:40:11 UTC