- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:03:59 -0600
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, plh@w3.org
That seems to overtake my action re the license http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/29 On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 16:53 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: [...] > Earlier today, I had a phone call with Philippe Le Hégaret > <http://www.w3.org/People/LeHegaret/>. > > We did not discuss these things in the above order, but we covered all > the points. > > = Topic 1: License = > > We started with the license. In my discussions with Ian and at Mozilla, > I gathered that it was a shared understanding that by October that the > license for the W3C license would be somehow open source friendly, and > specifically that a Creative Commons Attribution license was something > that was of common and general interest. > > Philippe remains highly supportive of this direction, and indicated that > it would be helpful to him if this were more than simply a general > understanding, but instead were an explicit decision of the working group. > > I already know that this is the intent and desire of Ian. Therefore, I > intend to place on Thursday's agenda a request for supporters and/or > objections on this direction. If we get a minimum of two independent > supporters and no objections by the following Thursday, I'll inform plh > of the decision. If we don't, I'll continue to work the issue, giving > people an opportunity to request a poll and/or I'll work with people to > help them clarify their objections. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 22:04:09 UTC