- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:00:45 -0800
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > Did we just achieve consensus between the HTML and the PFWG > on ISSUE-31 missing-alt? > > i.e. James, are you pretty sure the rest of the PF WG agrees > with you? I can't speak for group consensus on the matter b/c that issue wasn't taken to a vote. I did report the change back to the group though, so they are aware of the new note. > Matt May, Chaals, etc. is Ian's position close enough > to your own? It works for me. Do we have 3 independent parties > in agreement, I wonder? > > (FWIW, editorially, I like the suggestion of > 3 Feb 2009 08:47:11 +0200 to include the two by three table) Ditto.
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 04:01:26 UTC