Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status from William Loughborough on 2009-02-13 (public-html@w3.org from February 2009)

From: William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:53:46 -0800
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, janina@rednote.net
Message-ID: <1e3451610902130753x68286cdfr775245983fe0ad03@mail.gmail.com>

I guess it depends on which "October" you're talking about!

This whole "war" over HTML 5 seems to ignore the fact that although it's
easy enough for vendors to implement many of its points, on the whole this
thing will take many years to complete and then it will be totally obsolete.

Love.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> ...I remain deeply skeptical on the notion of this working group reaching
> Last Call in October.

Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 15:54:27 UTC