- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:34:42 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, janina@rednote.net
Sam Ruby wrote: > The notification of the actual publication could have been handled better. > > The decision to publish, however, was openly and widely discussed over a > long period of time. Pointers can be found here: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/65 > >> Philip TAYLOR > > - Sam Ruby I am afraid that I remain unconvinced that there /was/ any "decision to publish"; there was a "plan to publish", but from my reading of the messages that followed Chris's announcement of this plan, this was still under debate. The last message was sent at the end of January, and by that time I do not think that a consensus (or even near-consensus) had emerged. I believe that publication was premature, and that this WG should have been consulted again before publication went ahead. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 15:35:49 UTC