Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal

Ah, thank you Lachlan : I had indeed
missed six of the nine.  In the light
of the later comments, I can see that
there is a basis for concern, although
(like Andrew) I am concerned that we use
"backward(s) compatible" to mean a number
of different things.

Philip TAYLOR
--------
Lachlan Hunt wrote:

 > The threading appears to be broken in the list archive, so you may have
 > missed some if you didn't look hard enough. There's 9 emails in the
 > thread in November and 5 in December, including objections from several
 > others.

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:16:43 UTC