- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:00:23 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 14:17 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > ... > > ISSUE-54 (doctype-legacy-compat): tools that can't generate <!DOCTYPE > > html> > > > > It's not clear to me what needs changing in the spec for these issues. > > For all three, the spec seems detailed and I am not aware of any > > actual problems having been raised and not yet addressed. > > ... > > Apparently this is because the spec changed, but the issue hasn't been > updated. I updated it to PENDING REVIEW based on chatting with the chairs: 2009-02-19 04:50:12: updating to pending review, since we seem to have consensus around the 30 Jan proposal [Dan Connolly] -- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/54 reminder, for reference: "PENDINGREVIEW = An Editor has reviewed arguments and edited spec to taste, or the WG chairs have evaluated the level of consensus and identified one or more proposals that would resolve the issue." -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML I think we can close this issue as soon as the scheme is registered... ACTION-103 on Lachlan Hunt: track registration of about: URI scheme - due 2009-03-05 - open -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 19:00:37 UTC