- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:02:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:07:19 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > > When a Document is in quirks mode, margins on HTML elements that
> > > collapse with the top or bottom of the initial containing block are
> > > expected to be collapsed to zero.
> > >
> > > I think this should be more general, sort of like:
> > >
> > > :first-child { margin-top:0 }
> > > :last-child { margin-bottom:0 }
> > >
> > > ...but I haven't looked into whether that matches reality or not.
> >
> > That CSS definitely doesn't match reality. I'm not sure if my english
> > prose does either, though. Are there cases that I missed that aren't
> > covered by existing CSS spec text?
>
> I was thinking of e.g. this case:
>
> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3Cstyle%3E%20td%20%7B%20border%3Asolid%20%7D%20%3C%2Fstyle%3E%0A%3Ctable%3E%3Ctd%3E%3Cp%3Ex%3Cdiv%3Ex%3C%2Fdiv%3E%3Cp%3Ex
Oh, right, table cells. Fixed.
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > >
> > > Only Firefox (maybe WebKit?) seems to have display:block for multicol. I
> > > could not find a browser that has it for spacer. So these two elements
> > > should be removed from that list I think. (Thanks to Simon.)
> >
> > Dropped multicol. Couldn't find mention of spacer in the rendering
> > section.
>
> I think Anne meant 'layer'. :-)
Fixed.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 08:03:30 UTC