- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:13:30 +0100
- To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <lhs@malform.no>, "Robert J Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:41:07 +0100, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> wrote: > > Robert J Burns 2009-02-10 18.37: >> On Feb 9, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >>>> For example, I think we could get consensus that img with no al >>>> attribute is "conformant but not recommended". I don't think we will >>>> get consensus that img with no alt is conformant and recommended, and >>>> I am dubious about consensus that it is non-conformant. >>> As far as I can tell we already have consensus on alt="" being >>> required. (With one or two exceptions, the spec requires alt="" to be >>> present. The exceptions are machine-checkable.) >> Up to your first sentence I think we agree. Though I might have >> gone so far to say we have consensus since I felt there were some >> objections to alt='' being required. > > It is worth trying to understand Ian vs. Charles. Both agree that HTML 5 > documents entirely free from alt attributes could deserve the W3 > Validator's "Valid" badge - depending on so and so. > > However, according to Charles, lack of @alt becomes a 'downplayed error' > ('conformant but not recommended'). It is unclear whether Charles sees > *any* lack of alt as 'conforming/not recommended' or if he limits > conformances to Ian's machine-checkable exceptions. Actually, I think Ian's machine-checkable exceptions are reasonable candidates for "conformant". I am talking about the infamous case where nobody who knows has said anything about what the alt should be, in which case there should not be some made-up text, simply a missing alt attribute and this should be recommended against - explicitly identified as a problem (but one that stuffing some dummy text in will only aggravate). I.e. having alt="" for cases where there is nothing known is a more serious error (since it is misleading information rather than simply insufficient information) than not having an alt attribute or some recognised alternative. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 08:14:26 UTC