Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 from William Loughborough on 2009-02-25 (public-html@w3.org from February 2009)

From: William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:12:11 -0800
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Steve Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, janina@rednote.net, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Matt Morgan-May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1e3451610902250812p4126ad21ie8b4a6e57b7ce72a@mail.gmail.com>

By leaving out the modifying clause "however, one does wonder why the
resistance to something so obviously benefitial is so *strong*." you have
done David a disservice. He was clearly "wondering" about resistance and not
trying to use bad manners.

Your response is equally hard to "put up with" because it ignores a pretty
obvious fact: there is resistance and it is strong.

Love.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

>
> I will neither ignore nor put up with such statements.

Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 16:12:54 UTC