- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:25:00 +0000
- To: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Apologies for weighing in late on this, but I thought I would offer opinions for some of the common things that have come up during the debate. The purpose of the summary attribute is to provide a description of how the table should be read by people with visual impairments. For partially sighted people using screen magnifiers, or people with some types of cognitive disabilities, that information could be useful; for that reason, I have no objection to the information being available on demand for anyone. For the majority of sighted users, a description of how the table is laid out is redundant, as it will be visually evident. It would be ideal if user agents provided a mechanism for revealing/hiding the description, rather than making the author responsible for revealing/hiding the information. If it's implemented at the user agent level, it will be consistent, and more likely to be discovered by the people that need it. How the table is to be read by a human is a property of the table and something that couldn't be automated by AT, as only the author could provide that information. Putting the information outside of the table and providing a reference to the content removes an essential property from the table. The problem with using aria-describedby is that aria-describedby is intended to provide a generic long description. Just because a table has an aria-describedby property, it does not mean that the description is suitable for a summary. It could be any kind of long description for the table, whereas the summary attribute has the specific purpose of describing how a person should read the table. I don't think there is any doubt that the attribute is required. Suggested alternatives should ideally be a property of the table, and designed to specifically provide a description of how the table should be read. Ideally, I think modifying the existing attribute so that it can be revealed on demand is a reasonable way forward. Cheers, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 21:25:44 UTC