- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:25:07 -0500
- To: "'Philip TAYLOR \(Ret'd\)'" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "'Philip TAYLOR'" <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:19 PM > To: Ian Hickson > Cc: Philip TAYLOR; HTML WG > Subject: Re: Design principles - building from justification > > > > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > In my head, mostly, though as you note, a lot of the reasoning is > also on > > the mailing lists. If anyone wants to volunteer to write up the > reasoning > > for the features in (or not in!) the HTML5 spec, I'd be happy to meet > with > > them and given them a "brain dump". > > Well, I do think that would be a very useful > exercise, particularly for those who have > been members only of this WG and who are > therefore not familiar with the discussions > that took place within WHATWG prior to this > WG's establishment. I agree, and I think that it will go a long way towards providing the HTML 5 specification with legitimacy, and mitigate claims of unilateral decision making. J.Ja
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 23:26:02 UTC