Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel from Ben Adida on 2009-02-27 (public-html@w3.org from February 2009)

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:22:20 -0800
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-ID: <49A8214C.3010900@adida.net>

Henri Sivonen wrote:
> What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea

It is incorrect to use the term "erratum" to discuss a proposed major
change to a REC with numerous implementors and deployed markup that do
not consider this an error.

I am strongly opposed to this major change. I believe CURIEs and
link-types can co-exist just fine, as has been shown by existing
implementors including Creative Commons and Yahoo.

-Ben

Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 17:26:04 UTC