[IndexedDB] Exceptions on IndexedDatabaseRequest.open
[widgets] Draft agenda for 1 April 2010 voice conf
[IndexedDB] Opening a database with a different description
Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution
[widgets] Korean text corrupted
Review request for icon URI scheme draft
Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback
[XHR2] term "flag", for authors
Adding Content-Disposition header to File.urn response
[FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
- Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN?
Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter
- Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter
- Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter
[Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft
- Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft
- Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft
[XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
FormData with sliced Blob
Handling of locally-served files via XHR and as iframe source
[widgets] URI spec: Note for authors
[widgets] Draft minutes for 18 March 2010 voice conf
ISSUE-116: Need to flesh out the security considerations for the openURL method in the Widget Interface spec
Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState
[widgets] Draft agenda for 18 March 2010 Voice Conf; ** 1 hr earlier for Europe **
[IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions
[widgets] Span example
- Re: [widgets] Span example
[widgets] dir and span tests
Request for Comments: Media Resource specs
[IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions)
[IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface
- Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface
- Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface
Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback
ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy
CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
- Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec
Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17
[cors] Response header whitelist requires changing the API
Advanced Pointer Events: Use Cases
Fwd: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17
Transition announcement: Third LC of wsc-ui
[widgets] Apache Wookie's W3C Widget parser now available as standalone Java library
[WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
- Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call
[widgets] IESG Approved Media Type application/widget
Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010
Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains
[widgets] Draft Minutes for 4 March 2010 voice conference
VMMF — new version
- [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17
- Re: VMMF — new version
- Re: VMMF — new version
- RE: VMMF - new version
[widgets] Draft agenda for 4 March 2010 voice conf
Event handlers - Pointer Devices
Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
Fwd: Information about latest specs for language tagging
[widgets] dir and span elements
- Re: [widgets] dir and span elements
- Re: [widgets] dir and span elements
[widgets] Draft minutes from 25 February 2010 voice conf
WebSocket API access to headers
Review request: widget URI scheme
[widgets] Draft agenda for 25 February 2010 voice conference
FW: OMTP BONDI 1.1 Approved Release
[WebSQLDatabase] openDatabase() creation callback
File URN lifetimes and SharedWorkers
Web services and Rich Internet Applications documentation request
XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols
- Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols
[widgets] ITS in Widgets
Re: WebSockets questions, bufferedAmount
[widgets] Draft minutes from 18 February 2010 voice conf
[IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions
[IndexedDB] Deleting/managing databases and entity stores
[IndexedDB] Inverted indexes (for full text search)
Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed
- Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed
- Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed
[IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2)
RE: [whatwg] Window id - a proposal to leverage session usage in webapplication
[widgets] Draft agenda for 18 February 2010 voice conf
How do I join this list?
[XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon)
[XHR] status
[xhr] authorization (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call)
FormData questions
FYI: W3C Workshop on Future Standards for Model-Based User Interfaces
Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization
Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG
[XHR] RfC for Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; deadline 11 March
[widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec
[widgets] Draft minutes from 11 February 2010 voice conference
[widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources
Re: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments
[widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf
- Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf
- RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf
[widgets] LCWDs of XML Signature specs published
Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec
[widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
- Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations
Rechartering WebApp WG
- Re: Rechartering WebApp WG
- Re: Rechartering WebApp WG
[widgets] Important Test Suite Updates
[widgets] TWI: comments
[widgets-twi] window object
[widgets] Draft Minutes for 4-Feb-2010 voice conference
[UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest())
Notifications
- Re: Notifications
- Re: Notifications
[widgets] Draft Agenda for 4 February 2010 voice conf
[widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication
- Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication
ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR]
- Re: ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR]
- Re: ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR]
ISSUE-114 (CORS-credentials): CORS does not define the effect of the credentials flag in sufficient detail [CORS]
element.onresize
[WARP] Use cases for local network access
[widgets] Null in P&C
[WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec?
[XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
- Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()
ISSUE-113 (resize): Clarify when resize events fire [DOM3 Events]
Seeking implementation data for CORS and UMP
Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?)
RE: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API
Some IndexedDB feedback
Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009.
Re: The most basic File API use case
[Bug 8241] Named properties on window
[widgets] follow-ups on the URI scheme spec
[widgets-interface] Marking Widget as [NoInterfaceObject]
[XHR] New api request
One <feature>, multiple resources
[widgets] TWI: Fixes to test cases
localStorage Event
XHR
[WebTiming] HTMLElement timing
- Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing
- Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing
- Standardizing Web Timing?
- Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing
- Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing
[FastMutation] Updated Proposal on the DOM L3 Events Wiki
[IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft
- Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft
XQuery WG Comments on Indexed Database API
[Bug 8814] New: Introduction paragraph and example are out of sync
[XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection
Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
- Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme
Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
- Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName
Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)
- Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)
- Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase)
[widgets] Draft Minutes for 21 January 2010 voice conference
FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03
[widgets] TWI test case errors
[widgets] Draft agenda for 21 January 2010 voice conf
[selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2
- Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2
- Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2
A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology)
- Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology)
- Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology)
- Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology)
Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
- Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2
[widgets] P&C typo in 9.1.9. Rule for Parsing a Non-negative Integer
[XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations
- Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations
[XHR] same-origin request event rules are underspecified
Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier
[Bug 8241] Named properties on window
Re-introduction
IndexedDB and MVCC
Restart the group
[Bug 8758] New: Define DOMContentLoaded
[WARP] Extending access to local network resources
[widgets][vmmf] clarifications
[widgets] No Voice Conf on 14 January; next call is 21 January
Re: [UMP] Server opt-in
[UMP] Proxy-Authorization
Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5?
- Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5?
- Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5?
- Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5?
File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
- Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes.
[UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read
- Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read
- Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read
Introducing Rokesh Jankie, for the Web Applications groups
Re: Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4
Editorial Update: Signature Properties
[UMP] A declarative version of "Uniform Messaging Policy"
- CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
- Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19
[widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties
- Re: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties
- RE: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties
[widgets] Draft Minutes for 7 January 2010 Voice Conference
Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?
- CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15
- Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?
Re: [widgets] white space handling
- Re: [widgets] white space handling
- Re: [widgets] white space handling
- Re: [widgets] white space handling
MPEG-U
[widgets] Draft Agenda for 7 January 2010 Voice Conf
[Bug 8241] Named properties on window
Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?
- Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?
[UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site
Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial)
- Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial)
- Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial)
Re: [widgets] features: default value for required
Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ?
Transition
[widgets] Reminder: RfC for LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010
Re: [DataCache] Remove or Replace a Local Server Handler?
Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding
- Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding