W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:56:56 +0100
Message-ID: <b21a10671002030656r2d9ab509md32c691df4a44ee5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Art,

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> Marcos, All - below is a list of headers for comments submitted to
> public-webapps re  the P&C spec and test suite after CR#2 was published on
> 1-Dec-2009. I think the list is complete but I haven't double-checked it.
>
> Will addressing any of the post-CR#2 comments prevent this spec from
> advancing to Proposed Recommendation:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr

IMO, there is nothing preventing this spec from progressing to PR from
those emails. The emails have only resulted in clarifications to the
spec and fixes in the test suite.

However, I'd personally like to see two "commercial-grade"
implementations (or whatever you would call them, products with
100,000+ users) pass 100% of the test suite before moving this to PR.
I'd hate to see spec bugs showing up in the wild while in PR, when we
could have caught them during the CR phase - or that QA processes from
well-funded  commercial entities discover issues during PR that where
not caught by the smaller scale implementations we currently have (no
offence to anyone that has implemented thus far, I'm just trying to
assure the quality for the benefit of everyone). Anyway that's my
position. If other implementers feel confident that the spec is solid
enough to become a standard, then onwards we go :)




> -Art Barstow
>
>
> = From:  marcosc@opera.com
> Subject:        [widgets] Null in P&C
> Date:   February 2, 2010 7:29:42 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B681AB6.2060101@opera.com>
>
> =       From:     arveb@opera.com
> Subject:        One <feature>, multiple resources
> Date:   January 29, 2010 7:45:18 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u7aodsi2byn2jm@galactica>
>
> = From: marcosc@opera.com
> Subject: [widgets] P&C typo in 9.1.9. Rule for Parsing a Non-negative
> Integer
> Date:   January 19, 2010 7:06:21 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/b21a10671001190406p6d804eachb42b2261ed673da6@mail.gmail.com>
>
> =       From:     scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
> Subject:        [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java?
> Date:   December 17, 2009 4:57:21 PM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/78001806-B3B5-4751-BBC9-C166B7EEB21C@gmail.com>
>
> =       From:     scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com
> Subject:        [widgets] test-suite: start file encoding
> Date:   December 17, 2009 12:21:42 PM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/7C6E8FCF-91AE-4A5D-97C2-7AA35F8CA90D@gmail.com>
>
> =       From:     cyril.concolato@enst.fr
> Subject:        [widgets] white space handling
> Date:   December 17, 2009 7:26:24 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B2A2370.60009@enst.fr>
>
> =       From: eyal@isoc.org.il ; Eyal Sela
> Subject:        Widget packaging conformance
> Date:   December 16, 2009 7:18:37 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/013601ca7e49$e56f27e0$b04d77a0$@org.il>
>
> =       From: cyril.concolato@enst.fr
> Subject:        [widgets] duplicated feature elements ?
> Date:   December 16, 2009 4:51:20 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B28AD98.9030009@enst.fr>
>
> =       From: cyril.concolato@enst.fr
> Subject:        [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?
> Date:   December 16, 2009 4:13:55 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B28A4D3.5060003@enst.fr>
>
> =       From: cyril.concolato@enst.fr
> Subject:        [widgets] features: default value for required
> Date:   December 16, 2009 3:50:02 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B289F3A.1010504@enst.fr>
>
> =       From: cyril.concolato@enst.fr
> Subject:        [widgets] test suite: br.wgt
> Date:   December 15, 2009 10:41:31 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B27AE2B.6030206@enst.fr>
>
> =       From: marcosc@opera.com
> Subject:        Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute
> Date:   December 14, 2009 10:49:04 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/b21a10670912140749o10252cevaa8a25699a158662@mail.gmail.com>
>
> =       From:     amit.kasher@pnyxe.com
> Subject:        Widget specification - liquid height support
> Date:   December 10, 2009 9:54:15 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/4b210bab.1438560a.1fc4.ffffc2a7@mx.google.com>
>
> =       From: cyril.concolato@enst.fr
> Subject:        [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial)
> Date:   December 9, 2009 7:50:44 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B1F9D24.3010807@enst.fr>
>
> =       From: marcosc@opera.com
> Subject: Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors
> Date:   December 9, 2009 6:34:30 PM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/b21a10670912091534nf8c2cfbq875b5fa93445ad0b@mail.gmail.com>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 14:57:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:36 GMT