W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology)

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:45:05 +0100
Message-Id: <9E92F2CF-A2B8-4E4F-BD7D-6B8F586DA27C@opera.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: "public-mwts@w3.org" <public-mwts@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>


On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>  
wrote:

> Hi Marcos,
>
> Le mardi 19 janvier 2010 à 16:49 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
>> A draft of "A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its
>> Applications" in now available for review online [1]. For those that
>> have not seen it, it basically just documents how we are  
>> standardizing
>> the Widget specs and some basic QA processes:
>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/dev-ind-testing/extracting-test-assertions-pub.html
>
> Thanks for your thorough edits to the original document!
>
> I’ve brought my own set of corrections [1] to the draft (including t 
> he
> errors and possible improvements pointed by Doug); the most visible
> change I made was to replace “conformance clause” by “conforman 
> ce
> requirement” to be consistent with the usual vocabulary in that spac 
> e.
>
> Once Wilhelm and Dmitri have sent their reviews (and assuming they  
> don’t
> show any blockers), I’ll move with the requesting publication as Fir 
> st
> Public Working Group Note.
>
> Dom (for MWI test suites ACTION-114
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/Tests/track/actions/114)
>
> 1.
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/dev-ind-testing/extracting-test-assertions-pub.html.diff?r1=1.27&r2=1.51&f=h
>

Great! Changes look good. Thanks for integrating Dougs suggestions. 
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 13:10:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:36 GMT