W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

[widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:59:14 -0500
Message-Id: <5DEA64D5-9AE4-413E-A0C0-7524C0594609@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
This is the start of a 2-week pre-LCWD call for comments re the View  
Modes Media Feature spec:

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/Overview.html

If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps@w3.org  
by March 17.

Note the Process Document states the following regarding the  
significance/meaning of a LCWD:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call

Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant  
technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements  
document) in the Working Draft;

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant  
dependencies with other groups;

* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these  
dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call  
announcement is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to  
advance the technical report to later maturity levels.
]]

Additionally, a LCWD should be considered feature-complete with all  
issues resolved.

We will explicitly ask the CSS WG (via the www-style mail list) for  
comments. If there are other groups that should be asked for  
comments, please forward this email to them or identify the group(s).

-Art Barstow


Begin forwarded message:

> From: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
> Date: March 4, 2010 8:13:17 AM EST
> To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
> Subject: VMMF  new version
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/ 
> 1DA7A886-141B-46FF-9FF7-6BAA6CC6E493@berjon.com>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication:  
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/.
>
> Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media  
> Queries. That, plus it being a UI oriented specification, means  
> that there's only one normative assertion and it's a SHOULD.
>
> Comments welcome, I think that this baby can ship.
>
> -- 
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 15:00:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:37 GMT