W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:33:35 +0100
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>
Message-ID: <op.u90nl9cm64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:06:45 +0100, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote:
> After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a  
> new draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/

The Web IDL should be cleaned up:

  * There is no such thing as DOMWindow
  * Supplemental interfaces should use [Supplemental]

The methods should raise some kind of exception when there is something  
wrong with the URL argument. See e.g. the open() method description in  
XMLHttpRequest.

It would be nice if fetching of resources was described in terms of the  
fetch algorithm from HTML5.

Currently there are no processing requirements for the mime argument of  
createWebNotification(), do we really need it?

Queuing should be defined in terms of the HTML5 event loop.

Should we really put another interface on the global object? Can we not  
put these on window.navigator like other APIs that integrate with the  
system layer?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 10:34:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:37 GMT