Hi Marcos, I think this is a really good piece of work - I'll be pointing a few people from other spec orgs at the draft as its addressing a common requirement. (As an implementer I found the approach - especially the implementation reports - really useful and easy to follow in practice.) S On 19 Jan 2010, at 15:49, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi all, > A draft of "A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and > its Applications" in now available for review online [1]. For those > that have not seen it, it basically just documents how we are > standardizing the Widget specs and some basic QA processes: > > http://dev.w3.org/2008/dev-ind-testing/extracting-test-assertions-pub.html > > Please consider this a working draft, as it likely contains typos, > and a couple of half-baked ideas, etc. Comments are, of course, > welcomed. It is expected that this document will be published as a > working group note at some point in the future. > > Kind regards, > Marcos > > Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >> >> Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >>> Hi Marcos, >>> >>> Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 17:45 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a >>> écrit : >>>> Le mardi 05 janvier 2010 à 17:44 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit : >>>>> I was literally doing an editorial pass right now. I would >>>>> appreciate >>>>> another day or two to finish (and for you and the WG to have a >>>>> chance to >>>>> review the changes). If I check-in a draft by Thursday, could we >>>>> aim to >>>>> publish next week? >>>> Sure, sounds good to me. Thanks for your help on this! >>> >>> Any news on your editing pass :) ? >> >> Sorry, I'm still working on it... it's taking a little longer than I >> first anticipated :( I've rewritten most of it to describe a bit more >> clearly how the method was applied. >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:55:32 UTC