W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:48:39 +0100
Cc: "cyril.concolato" <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D3EE6ABB-2303-4C35-B076-E150E0290BE1@berjon.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
On Jan 6, 2010, at 20:47 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> The ignore-unknowns strategy is largely built in order to support extensibility: because you ignore stuff you don't understand, it's possible for a v1 processor to process a v27 document (assuming it's designed to be compatible, which it should if it's using the same namespace).
>> 
>> In the case of feature names however we already have all the extensibility that we ought to need: IRIs are completely open. Consequently I can't think of a situation in which an author would produce an invalid feature name on purpose, so this is an obvious error.
> 
> So you support leaving the spec as is, right?

Yes indeed.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 09:49:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:36 GMT