W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Rechartering WebApp WG

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:18:27 -0500
Message-ID: <4B738513.5070808@w3.org>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi, Maciej-

Thanks for the feedback.


Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 2/10/10 8:10 PM):
>
> Some comments:
>
> - I would like to suggest the name "Web Messaging" for the postMessage /
> MessageChannel deliverable.

Done.


> - I think the "Other Specifications" section should be clear on the
> right process for adopting new deliverables without having to recharter.
> I think we want a process that is flexible but that retains transparency
> and accountability. I like the idea of writing requirements documents
> for these. Perhaps there should be some sort of review process for these
> requirements documents, in lieu of a full recharter cycle.

Sure, let's discuss this as a group to see what we are all comfortable 
with, and I will tighten up the language accordingly.  Right now, I 
don't know exactly what else to say.


> - I think errata for the existing DOM specs should be stated as
> in-scope. I believe we are the right group to do this, but it's better
> to be explicit. I think this would include even DOM specs where we may
> not plan to publish a whole new version.

Clarified.


> - I think it's no longer necessary to cite the previous Web API and WAF
> charters. If we do cite a previous charter it should be the previous
> version of the Web Apps WG charter, It hink.

Corrected.


Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 04:18:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:37 GMT