On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:39:26 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:29:53 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> > wrote: >> At the very least, throwing if the upper byte is non-zero seems like >> the right thing to do to prevent silent data loss. > > That works for me. More concretely, this means that combined with the rules coming from HTTP a SYNTAX_ERR exception would be raised for the value argument if one of the characters has a code point larger than U+00FF, if the code point is U+007F, or if the code point is smaller than U+0020 but is not U+0009. If this is all ok the lower bytes are collected as the new header value. Does this sound acceptable to implementors? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 10:03:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:36 GMT