W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: MPEG-U

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:47:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4B69380F.6020201@enst.fr>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
CC: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Steven Pemberton <steven@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Dear all,

I've been informed by the ISO secretariat that the liaison from MPEG was sent to the W3C and that the right persons this time have received it. Is it correct? Can you tell me what the next step is ? Has the group discussed it ? What is the opinion of the group ? If not, when will it be discussed ?

Regards,

Cyril   

Le 20/01/2010 17:24, Doug Schepers a écrit :
> Hi, Cyril-
>
> Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/20/10 12:24 AM):
>>
>> Le 13/01/2010 19:59, Doug Schepers a écrit :
>>>
>>> Cyril Concolato wrote (on 1/13/10 10:37 AM):
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you're right, the problem is that liaisons usually are not
>>>> considered as public documents so the secretariat or MPEG members are
>>>> not allowed to make them public.
>>>> ...
>>>> Anyway, MPEG is meeting next week, I'll
>>>> raise your questions and try to have MPEG make a formal answer.
>>>
>>> Could you please make sure that the secretariat sends the email to
>>> team-liaisons@w3.org, CCing Steven, Mike, and me, as the Team Contacts
>>> for the WebApps WG, and Philippe Le Hegaret as Interaction Domain Lead?
>>> It's not appropriate to email Tim Berners-Lee for liaisons at this
>>> level, though if they insist, I suppose they can include him. We need to
>>> make sure that these liaisons are dealt with in a timely manner.
>>>
>>> I would greatly appreciate if you could have the secretariat send an
>>> immediate acknowledgment email to the above email addresses, just to
>>> make sure that the process is understood and accepted, before sending
>>> the liaison itself. Could you please request that right away?
>>>
>>> I know you are doing what you can to make sure the communication
>>> channels are clear, so I appreciate your help.
>>
>> Just for clarification. I don't know yet if the liaison can be sent to a
>> public mailing list. But if it is possible, is it preferable to send it
>> directly to the public mailing list or to list of persons you mentioned?
>
> My personal preference is that the technical discussion happen on
> public-webapps, of course, but that is a dialog that should be carried
> on by people like you, who are in both organizations.
>
> Liaisons from MPEG (and other organizations) tend to be formal documents
> (usually in Word or PDF format), and require formal documents in return,
> so we need to address that in a separate channel, after the technical
> discussion has taken place. If it is possible to have these liaisons
> sent to the public list as well as the people and lists I mention above,
> please do so; failing that, please ask them to send the liaisons to
> member-webapps as well.
>
> If we need to draw up a Memorandum of Understanding regarding this,
> please let us know. Thanks again.
>
> Regards-
> -Doug Schepers
> W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
>


-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 08:47:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:36 GMT