public-rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2012 by date

Thursday, 31 May 2012

• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup Gavin Carothers
• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup David Wood
• Spec editorial: use RDFa 1.1 markup Gregg Kellogg
• Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

• Fwd: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD Ivan Herman
• Re: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD Dan Brickley
• RDF WG minutes for 2012-05-30 Manu Sporny
• Re: how we refer to both g-boxes and g-snaps (ISSUE-32) Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June David Wood
• Re: JSON-LD FPWD publication proposal Manu Sporny
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Thomas Baker
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Thomas Baker
• Re: how we refer to both g-boxes and g-snaps Pat Hayes
• RE: Agenda 30 May telecon Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Agenda 30 May telecon David Wood
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Richard Cyganiak
• RE: Agenda 30 May telecon Yves Raimond
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Sandro Hawke
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Sandro Hawke
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Andy Seaborne
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Richard Cyganiak
• RDF-ISSUE-91 (rdf-concepts-feedback): RDF Concepts feedback from Gavin and Pat [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense Andy Seaborne
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Richard Cyganiak
• Re: JSON-LD FPWD publication proposal Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Gavin Carothers
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Pat Hayes
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Pat Hayes
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense Pat Hayes
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense Pat Hayes
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Pat Hayes
• Re: Why empty named graphs make sense Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Gavin Carothers
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Sandro Hawke
• Re: pre-agenda telecon 30 May Arnaud Le Hors
• Agenda 30 May telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Pat Hayes
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Pat Hayes
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Gavin Carothers

Tuesday, 29 May 2012

• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Sandro Hawke
• n-quads & Turtle Levels Sandro Hawke
• Re: Question about RDF Spaces Sandro Hawke
• how we refer to both g-boxes and g-snaps Sandro Hawke
• rdf11-concepts WD ready Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Pat Hayes
• JSON-LD FPWD publication proposal Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Nathan
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Richard Cyganiak
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-05-29 Manu Sporny
• test - ignore Nathan
• pre-agenda telecon 30 May Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle Guus Schreiber
• Re: List of WG Resolutions Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 28 May 2012

• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: List of WG Resolutions Ivan Herman
• Re: List of WG Resolutions Richard Cyganiak
• Re: List of WG Resolutions David Wood
• Re: RDF Concepts - What is a Node? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle David Wood
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June David Wood
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle Steve Harris
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Ivan Herman
• remedial steps [Was: Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Andy Seaborne
• rdf:HTML vs rdf:HTMLLiteral (was: Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June Ivan Herman
• Re: Question about RDF Spaces Ivan Herman
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June Dan Brickley
• RDF Slides for SemTechBiz in June David Wood
• Re: List of WG Resolutions David Wood
• Re: Turtle conformance section Sandro Hawke
• Re: Question about RDF Spaces Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 27 May 2012

• List of WG Resolutions David Wood

Saturday, 26 May 2012

• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on RDF Spaces document Ivan Herman
• Re: Redefining “resource” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Invitation to join next JSON-LD telecon Andy Seaborne
• Re: Redefining “resource” Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Primer in Turtle Ivan Herman
• RDF Primer in Turtle David Wood

Friday, 25 May 2012

• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Invitation to join next JSON-LD telecon David Wood
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs David Wood
• Connected resources Dan Brickley
• Invitation to join next JSON-LD telecon Manu Sporny
• Re: Redefining “resource” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Redefining “resource” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Redefining “resource” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Redefining “resource” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Redefining “resource” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Redefining “resource” Dan Brickley
• Re: High-level comments on Turtle document Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Redefining “resource” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Redefining “resource” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Redefining “resource” (was: Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”) Dan Brickley
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Redefining “resource” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Redefining “resource” (was: Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”) Steve Harris
• Redefining “resource” (was: Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources”) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Steve Harris
• High-level comments on Turtle document Richard Cyganiak
• Comments on RDF Spaces document Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Manu Sporny

Thursday, 24 May 2012

• Re: AAAI Fellow David Wood
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes
• AAAI Fellow Pat Hayes
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Pat Hayes
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Andy Seaborne
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Ivan Herman
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Antoine Zimmermann
• Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs Manu Sporny
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 23 May 2012

• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Semantics for stateful resources Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) Richard Cyganiak
• Semantics for stateful resources Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD Gavin Carothers
• Re: Informative wording on identifiers for subgraphs Pat Hayes
• Informative wording on identifiers for subgraphs Richard Cyganiak
• Turtle conformance section Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• The problem with formal logic Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes
• Re: Agenda 23 May telecon - final Alex Hall
• The problem with logic Pat Hayes
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Guus Schreiber
• Re: Agenda 23 May telecon - final Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-28 Guus Schreiber
• Re: ISSUE-28 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-28 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-28 (was: Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-28 - two readings? Pat Hayes
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• ISSUE-28 - two readings? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Andy Seaborne
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Manu Sporny
• Re: Drop ?g-boxes?, talk about ?stateful resources? Thomas Baker
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late Pat Hayes
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Thomas Baker
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG David Wood
• Agenda 23 May telecon - final Guus Schreiber
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Guus Schreiber
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late David Wood
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late Andy Seaborne
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Andy Seaborne
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Andy Seaborne
• Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late Guus Schreiber
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Ivan Herman
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Thomas Steiner
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Andy Seaborne
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” David Wood
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Ivan Herman
• Re: Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Kingsley Idehen
• Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Richard Cyganiak
• Drop “g-boxes”, talk about “stateful resources” Richard Cyganiak
• JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG Manu Sporny

Monday, 21 May 2012

• Re: The entailment rules (was: Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft?) Pat Hayes
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Pat Hayes
• RDF-ISSUE-90 (LV-entailment): Define a simple form of �??literal value entailment�?? [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• The entailment rules (was: Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE--1: Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD Steve Harris
• RDF-ISSUE--1: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF Ivan Herman

Sunday, 20 May 2012

• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Pat Hayes

Saturday, 19 May 2012

• Re: status of xsd:duration in RDF Pat Hayes
• Fwd: status of xsd:duration in RDF Ivan Herman

Friday, 18 May 2012

• Subsection 11.2 - Displaying (X)HTML Gavin Carothers
• N-triples white space question Gavin Carothers
• N-Quads syntax (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Guus Schreiber
• Proposal for getting Turtle to LC and N-Triples to FPWD Gavin Carothers
• Re: Making progress on graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: trying to enforce IRI syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: trying to enforce IRI syntax Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• trying to enforce IRI syntax Sandro Hawke
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• Re: N-triples white space question Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-triples white space question Gavin Carothers
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-triples white space question Andy Seaborne
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Sandro Hawke
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Sandro Hawke
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Alex Hall
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Alex Hall
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Sandro Hawke
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-triples white space question Sandro Hawke
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Alex Hall
• Re: N-triples white space question Andy Seaborne
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Andy Seaborne
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Richard Cyganiak
• Re: N-triples white space question Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Steve Harris
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Sandro Hawke
• Re: policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Steve Harris
• Re: Making progress on graphs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• Re: N-triples white space question Richard Cyganiak
• Re: N-triples white space question Richard Cyganiak
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Steve Harris
• Re: policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Steve Harris
• Re: N-triples white space question Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: N-triples white space question Andy Seaborne
• Re: policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Richard Cyganiak
• Re: turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Richard Cyganiak
• Re: N-triples white space question Richard Cyganiak
• N-triples white space question Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress on graphs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 17 May 2012

• Re: Making progress on graphs Kingsley Idehen
• turtle conformance clause / strict-vs-loose parsing Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• rdf:HTML datatype added Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Subsection 11.2 - Displaying (X)HTML Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Steve Harris
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Steve Harris
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• New Provenance Drafts -- ready for review -- getting close to LC Sandro Hawke
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Steve Harris
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Data spaces draft Ted Thibodeau Jr
• minutes for RDF teleconference on 16 May Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Why empty named graphs make sense Andy Seaborne
• Re: no-primary-key no-functional-change proposal convergence Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Ivan Herman
• no-primary-key no-functional-change proposal convergence Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Alex Hall
• Re: Sandro's Formal Objection Dan Brickley
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Data spaces draft Sandro Hawke
• Re: Data spaces draft Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Sandro's Formal Objection Sandro Hawke
• Re: Sandro's Formal Objection Guus Schreiber
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris
• RE: Agenda 16 May telecon Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris
• Sandro's Formal Objection Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress on graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Making progress on graphs Guus Schreiber
• Re: Agenda 16 May telecon Yves Raimond
• Data spaces draft Guus Schreiber
• Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Steve Harris
• Re: Agenda 16 May telecon Steve Harris
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. Steve Harris
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Guus Schreiber
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Checking: Turtle grammar / N-Triples Grammar Andy Seaborne
• Some real graphs Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress on graphs Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

• Re: “RDF systems” and empty graphs (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) Richard Cyganiak
• Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Agenda 16 May telecon Antoine Zimmermann
• Agenda 16 May telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: whitespace in Turtle Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: whitespace in Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: whitespace in Turtle Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: whitespace in Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: whitespace in Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: whitespace in Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: “RDF systems” and empty graphs (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) Sandro Hawke
• whitespace in Turtle Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Gavin Carothers
• “RDF systems” and empty graphs (was: Re: Making progress on graphs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Remaining Open Issues in Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Thomas Baker

Monday, 14 May 2012

• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. Alex Hall
• policy for rdf: namespace? was Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle and predicate object lists. Andy Seaborne
• Turtle and predicate object lists. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Making progress on graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Making progress on graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Pat Hayes
• Re: Making progress on graphs Ivan Herman
• Re: Making progress on graphs Ivan Herman

Sunday, 13 May 2012

• Re: Making progress on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Making progress on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Making progress on graphs Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Making progress on graphs Dan Brickley
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Making progress on graphs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Making progress on graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Making progress on graphs Ivan Herman
• Making progress on graphs Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Richard Cyganiak
• Re: communicaton about Turtle compatibility Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Pat Hayes
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Pat Hayes

Saturday, 12 May 2012

• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Thomas Baker
• Re: communicaton about Turtle compatibility Dan Brickley
• communicaton about Turtle compatibility Sandro Hawke
• Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Sandro Hawke
• Re: What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? Sandro Hawke

Friday, 11 May 2012

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] David Wood
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Steve Harris
• Re: Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Ivan Herman
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Pat Hayes
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Ivan Herman
• grammar alignment with SPARQL Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 10 May 2012

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Richard Cyganiak
• What does it mean to “implement RDF” or “conform to RDF”? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Sandro Hawke
• Definitions of namespace IRI/prefix added to RDF Concepts (was: Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace") Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Pat Hayes
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Pat Hayes
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Ivan Herman
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• quintuples and Re: "whole reason quads were implemented" Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Nathan
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] Sandro Hawke
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Nathan
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Steve Harris
• Re: trusting quads Steve Harris
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Ivan Herman
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: trusting quads Steve Harris
• Re: rdf-spaces Andy Seaborne
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues Andy Seaborne
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Ivan Herman
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: "whole reason quads were implemented" Dan Brickley
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues Ivan Herman
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues Pat Hayes
• Re: trusting quads Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

• Re: trusting quads Dan Brickley

Thursday, 10 May 2012

• "whole reason quads were implemented" Sandro Hawke
• HTML datatype proposal (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

• Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues Richard Cyganiak
• Re: types of "graphs" Guus Schreiber
• Re: types of "graphs" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Thomas Baker
• Re: types of "graphs" Guus Schreiber
• Re: rdf-spaces Richard Cyganiak
• Re: types of "graphs" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides David Wood
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: trusting quads Kingsley Idehen
• Re: rdf-spaces Kingsley Idehen
• Re: trusting quads Andy Seaborne
• Re: trusting quads Steve Harris
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides Ivan Herman
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides Richard Cyganiak
• trusting quads Sandro Hawke
• Re: rdf-spaces Sandro Hawke
• RDF-ISSUE-89 (at-prefix): Should Turtle allow SPARQL's PREFIX like @prefix? [RDF Turtle] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: rdf-spaces Steve Harris
• Re: [ALL] WG Status Update Slides Steve Harris
• Re: Closing ISSUE-13 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdf-spaces Kingsley Idehen
• Closing ISSUE-13 David Wood
• Re: named graphs in HTML Andy Seaborne
• Re: types of "graphs" Guus Schreiber
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Guus Schreiber
• Re: types of "graphs" Guus Schreiber
• Re: rdf-spaces Nathan
• Re: rdf-spaces Ivan Herman
• Re: rdf-spaces Sandro Hawke
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Thomas Baker
• Re: named graphs in HTML Ivan Herman
• Re: rdf-spaces David Wood
• Re: rdf-spaces Gavin Carothers
• Defining rdf:XMLLiteral in terms of the DOM Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdf-spaces Andy Seaborne
• named graphs in HTML Sandro Hawke
• Re: rdf-spaces David Wood
• Re: rdf-spaces Andy Seaborne
• Re: rdf-spaces David Wood
• Re: rdf-spaces Andy Seaborne
• Re: rdf-spaces Ivan Herman
• rdf-spaces Sandro Hawke
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 9 May 2012 Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• [ALL] WG Status Update Slides David Wood
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 9 May 2012 Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle Richard Cyganiak
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics Steve Harris
• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) Steve Harris
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDF Lists Steve Harris
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Steve Harris
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Steve Harris
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Steve Harris
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Steve Harris
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" Steve Harris
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics Steve Harris
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle Ivan Herman
• Re: Unicode normalization in Turtle David Wood
• Unicode normalization in Turtle Richard Cyganiak

Monday, 7 May 2012

• [ALL] Agenda 9 May 2012 David Wood
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 6 May 2012

• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) Sandro Hawke
• Re: GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) Lee Feigenbaum
• GRAPH keyword in Turtle, PREFIX vs @prefix (was Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Gavin Carothers
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Sandro Hawke
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Gavin Carothers
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 5 May 2012

• types of "graphs" Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Sandro Hawke
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF Lists Sandro Hawke

Friday, 4 May 2012

• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Thomas Baker
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations William Waites
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? David Wood
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Ivan Herman
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Manu Sporny
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Manu Sporny
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Manu Sporny
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Manu Sporny
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Gavin Carothers
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF Lists Manu Sporny
• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Thomas Baker
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Manu Sporny
• Re: I really hate RDF Lists Scott Bauer
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Thomas Baker
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? David Wood
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF Semantics Editors Draft? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Andy Seaborne
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF Lists Andy Seaborne
• Re: Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Dan Brickley
• Re: Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Dan Brickley
• Deprecate most "native" RDF serializations Manu Sporny
• Vocab terms for owner, validFrom and validUntil Manu Sporny
• I really hate RDF Lists Manu Sporny
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Manu Sporny
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Manu Sporny

Thursday, 3 May 2012

• Re: Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Richard Cyganiak
• Ambiguity of "RDF namespace" - was: Re: Contradicting definitions of "property" Thomas Baker
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" David Wood
• [Turtle] Editorial Issue: Fwd: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title David Wood
• Re: HTML datatype David Wood
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title Andy Seaborne
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title Andy Seaborne
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Andy Seaborne
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Kingsley Idehen
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" David Wood
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Kingsley Idehen
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Pat Hayes
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Pat Hayes
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" Thomas Baker
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Pat Hayes
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Andy Seaborne
• Re: HTML datatype Gavin Carothers
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Pat Hayes
• HTML datatype Richard Cyganiak
• Two ACTIONs for RDF Semantics editors Richard Cyganiak
• RDF-ISSUE-88 (xsd:duration): Revisit the exclusion of xsd:duration from the RDF datatype list [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• May 2 telecon minutes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: the choice of the term "layer" Guus Schreiber
• the choice of the term "layer" Sandro Hawke
• status of xsd:duration in OWL (and RIF and SPARQL) - ACTION-164: RDF WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Dan Brickley
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF Ivan Herman
• RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Guus Schreiber
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 Scott Bauer
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle Draft Gavin Carothers
• Re: the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Sandro Hawke
• strawman draft of "RDF Data Layers and Datasets" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Layers David Wood
• Re: Layers Thomas Baker
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) David Wood
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Ivan Herman
• Re: Turtle Draft Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Layers Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Turtle Draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Layers Dan Brickley
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: the term "named graphs" Pat Hayes
• Re: Layers Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-86 (GraphIsomorphism): Incompatible definitions of “graph equivalence” between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: Layers (or maybe "Data Layers") Sandro Hawke
• Re: Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

• Turtle Draft Gavin Carothers
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 Charles Greer
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-86 (GraphIsomorphism): Incompatible definitions of “graph equivalence” between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] David Wood
• [ALL] Agenda for 2 May 2012 David Wood
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Gavin Carothers
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Andy Seaborne
• RDF-ISSUE-86 (GraphIsomorphism): Incompatible definitions of �??graph equivalence�?? between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Adding a datatype for HTML literals to RDF (ISSUE-63) Richard Cyganiak
• Proposal for adding new datatypes from XSD 1.1 (ISSUE-66) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral (ISSUE-13) Ivan Herman
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Sandro Hawke
• Proposal for rdf:XMLLiteral (ISSUE-13) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: understandings maths Sandro Hawke
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Andy Seaborne
• Re: understandings maths Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker
• understandings maths Sandro Hawke
• Re: Layers David Wood

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2012 23:39:51 UTC