- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:50:27 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Manu, On 24 May 2012, at 04:45, Manu Sporny wrote: > The JSON-LD Syntax specification > normatively references the JSON-LD API specification I followed the link you provided: http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/#references JSON-LD-API is not a normative reference there. Best, Richard > The first option is problematic because it muddies the clear delineation > we have now between JSON-LD "the language" and JSON-LD "the API". > > The second option is more reasonable, but requires us to publish the > JSON-LD API when we are still 3-4 months away from finalizing it. Doing > this would still be okay since FPWDs don't have to be "complete" by any > stretch of the imagination. > > Therefore, this is a request that the RDF WG publish both the JSON-LD > Syntax specification and the JSON-LD API specification as FPWDs. > > The JSON-LD Syntax specification can be found here: > http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/ > > The JSON-LD API specification can be found here: > http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-api/20120524/ > > If any member of the Linked JSON Community Group would like to object to > this request, please do so before next Wednesday at 11am ET. Keep in > mind that an objection will result in FPWDs not being considered for > publication by the RDF WG. > > The RDF WG will re-visit the request next week during the telecon. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched > http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/ >
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 14:51:07 UTC