- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 21:52:18 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 9 May 2012, at 17:17, Guus Schreiber wrote: > if people say something in RDF it is always in some box/space (in 2004-terms: the global box/space). So, people never create/store/query g-snaps, only containers (and transferring/storing them through some g-text). G-snaps just provide us with a mathematical view that allows us to reason with the contents of containers. This means we only need to provide mechanisms for typing g-boxes. Containers are by default dynamic, but for pragmatic reasons we might want to have a mechanism to say we consider a g-box to be frozen (which essentially is only a social contract). This sounds very sensible to me. > Ergo: we only need a type for a frozen g-box in our spec. Why do *we* need to define the term for a frozen g-box? Why not leave it to the community? Best, Richard
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 20:52:48 UTC