- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 22:07:31 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On May 1, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Dear all, > > XSD 1.1 has added a number of new datatypes, and revised some of the existing ones. XSD 1.1 is now a W3C Recommendation. ISSUE-66 asks the question whether to add the new types to the list of XSD types allowed in RDF. > > Alex has previously analysed the changes in XSD 1.1 from an RDF point of view: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Feb/0039.html > > I fully concur with his findings and recommendations, and hence propose: > > > PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-66 by adding xsd:duration, xsd:dayTimeDuration, xsd:yearMonthDuration and xsd:dateTimeStamp to the table of allowed XSD types in RDF Concepts ED Section 5.1 > > > (RDF Semantics has a redundant list of the same types; this also needs to be changed accordingly, or removed in favour of normatively referencing RDF Concepts.) +1 I am happy to have Semantics refer to Concepts for the list. Pat > > Best, > Richard > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 03:08:05 UTC