- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:02:39 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 15 May 2012, at 14:22, Sandro Hawke wrote: > My point about Trig still holds. If Trig follows the spirit of this > resolution, aligning its statements with SPARQL's "triples pattern > language" then we have keywords: @prefix, @base, and graph. Again, I don't think that's part of the resolution. The resolution is about this: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#QSynTriples GRAPH isn't part of triple pattern syntax. For the record, I'm not advocating here but simply pointing out my understanding of the resolution. Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 14:03:14 UTC